OpenDJ 3.0 has recently been released and the test equipment (SafeNet Data at Rest Encryption appliance) is still in our office, why not let's run a test again OpenDJ 3.0? :)
In OpenDJ 3.0, there are 2 local DB backends to choose from: JE (Oracle Berkeley DB Java Edition - 2.5 version) and PDB.
The throughtput for search operation is faster in OpenDJ 3.0 as compared to version 2.6. The response times are also slightly faster.
Encrypted partition: 11229 (JE) & 10488 (PDB) vs 10210 (JE) ~10% diff
Non-encrypted partition: 11305 (JE) & 11235 (PDB) vs 10410 (JE) ~ 8.5% diff
For write operations, the difference in throughput is not big. In fact, PDB performs worse. (Hmmm... Maybe need to ask my colleague to re-run the test again) ..
Non-encrypted partition: 3282 (JE) & 2824 (PDB) vs 3199 (JE) ~ 2.5% diff
The difference in response time is also not big. Again, I might want to re-run the test for PDB again. Or maybe some tuning is required. Not sure, it's something new to me. :)
Encrypted partition: 8.2 (JE) & 8.70 (PDB) vs 8.72 (JE)
Non-encrypted partition: 7.3 (JE) & 8.4 (PDB) vs 7.5 (JE)